Assignment 8 Part 2

My own Simulation Activity.

Simulation Used: Molecules and Light

Standards Met: A.12.7 Re-examine the evidence and reasoning that led to conclusions drawn from investigations, using the science themes

C.12.3 Evaluate* the data collected during an investigation*, critique the data-collection procedures and results, and suggest ways to make any needed improvements

G.12.1 Identify personal interests in science and technology, implications that these interests might have for future education, and decisions to be considered


Things to be completed.

1. Create a data table that the student believes accurately shows how different molecules effect different forms of light. Then peer review another students table and critique the method and organization used.

2. Examine the evidence gained from these data tables. What molecules interfere with infrared light? Visible light? Ultraviolet? Explain.

3.Explain why certain types of light are effected by certain molecules

4. How is this data relevant to previous scientific advancements? (for example microwave ovens)

5. What modern careers could be explored using this simulator?


Hypothesis Question

After looking at other students blogs, many of us developed a hypothesis that stated that cold water would in fact freeze faster, because its core temp is closer to the freezing temp. After completing the assignment and researching on my own I figured out this isn't the case. Known as the Mpemba effect, the faster evaporation of water causes less space to freeze compared to the colder water. I did not think this would be the case at all. I think we all sort of developed our hypothesis just using common sense, like cold water would freeze faster because it's colder. After research I learned this was false.